Hmmm... I wonder how many links I can loose in a single posting?
March 28, 2005
Update: 100 times better than this post... and with doxins.
Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo Schiavo
For the love of God or whatever will you all just shut up already. I’ve never heard so many hypocrites throwing around the word “hypocrites” in all my life.
I am only absolutely certain of only two things in this world:
a) I do not have one single clue into the nature of the metaphysical. I have no I idea if there is a God or gods. I have no idea if there is a greater plan. If a God or similar facsimile exists, I have no idea if he/she is good or evil. I do not know if there is such a thing as good, evil, right or wrong; or if these are simply social constructs. I don’t know when life begins. I don’t know when life ends. I do not have an adequate definition for term “human life.” Nor do I for the word “soul.”
b) Neither do you.
So, lets do the math:
V = Me having absolutely no insight into the nature of the metaphysical.
X = You having absolutely no insight into the nature of the metaphysical.
Y = The facts of the Schiavo case.
Z = Opinion is irrelevant.
V + Y = Z
X + Y = Z
Therefore,
V = X!!!!!!!!
So please do the world a favor and shut your hole, already.
In addition to knowing only two facts, I hold only one particularly strong opinion. “Faith,” despite all good press the word gets, does not even remotely resemble a virtue. It seems to me to be the most destructive, despicable and inhumane of all human character flaws. Add every one of the deadly sins together (and I’m down with the deadly sins totally sucking. Just like you, I’m guilty of all of them.) and they aren’t capable of the fraction of the destructive power of faith.
I’m not talking about faith in religion. I’m not not talking about a faith in material science. I’m not talking about a faith in Atheism. I’m not talking about Christian Fundamentalism, Wahhabism, Hassidism, Nihilism, or Existentialism. I’m not talking about a faith in one’s own convictions. I’m not talking about one’s faith in their own intellect. I’m not talking about a faith in a political system; whether it’s Capitalism, Communism, Anarchism, Maoism, Khmerism, Trotskyism, Nationalism, Ba’athism, Libertarianism, Liberalism, Conservatism or Vegetarianism. I’m talking about ALL OF THEM.
And trust me, I’m not above faith either. There are times when I’m utterly convinced that my intellect, opinions, convictions, in conjunction with all the crap I was raised to believe, are p-u-r-e money. Why do I feel this sometimes? Because, just like you, I can be a complete idiot who’s too arrogant and mentally lazy to acknowledge the fact that I don’t know a God damned thing.
But, the one thing that I will never do is try to pass faith off as some sort of a virtue... it isn’t. I will admit that faith feels really good; as does anger, covetousness, envy, gluttony, lust, sloth and pride. Every one of these will satiate you with a sense of satisfaction and contentment that will build on itself until it consumes every last ounce of your humanity, making you hate anybody and everybody who stands between you and that which makes you feel so good. Sound familiar?
If you believe that Terri Schiavo has a right to die with dignity, you’ve come to the conclusion that she is no longer a human based on your faith that the self is defined by consciousness, or at least by the possibility that consciousness can be regained. By your own definition, she is a human turnip. Dignity became a non-issue the day she lost conciousness. You might be right, you might be wrong; but her dignity has nothing to do with it. So please spare me the platitudes about dignity.
If you believe that Terri Schiavo must be spared because it is not man’s place to decide her mortality, you’ve come to that conclusion based on your faith in a higher power. You might be right, you might be wrong; but she is still a human turnip. And please don’t give me any of that crap about her not being a turnip based on the statements of a handful of shamelessly partisan religious doctors. There are plenty of religious doctorswho would put their faith before their hippocratic oath. Take Ayman Al-Zawahiri, for instance. Don’t lie to yourself and to the rest of the world in the name of your faith. That’s just pathetic.
Basically, if you’ve developed a conclusive opinion on this case, you’re a hypocrite. If you believe it is wrong to stop keeping a human turnip alive by artificial means, but believe that it is right to execute criminals, than you’re a hypocrite. If you believe the question of whether a human life begins at conception or birth is superseded by the importance of a woman’s right to make decisions about her body, but think it is wrong to execute criminals, than you’re a hypocrite (feel free to attack me as a pro-lifer. You would be wrong, but I’d love to hear the convictions of your faith. OOOOOh, I just committed liberal sacrilege and uttered the unspeakable question. *Boo!*).
Not that I’m being a particularly critical of anyone for being a hypocrite, regardless of your opinion. We’re all hypocrites. I’m a HUGE hypocrite. But if you have one ounce of faith in your own powers of reason, if you’ve actually convinced yourself that you and everybody that agrees with you is not a hypocrite, but everybody that disagrees with you is a hypocrite; than you’re just an idiot.
So what you're saying is that you're a little tired of all this Schiavo talk?
Personally, I don't care whether she lives or dies. My life won't be affected by hers in any way no matter what happens. I just think starving her to death is a terrible way to do it. If they're going to let her die, just kill her and get it over with. Maybe slice open the back of her head and suck out her brains with a vacuum tube. Heh.
But if it's any consolation, remember Elian Gonzalez. As soon as he got shipped back to Cuba the noise died down considerably. It'll be the same once Terri Schiavo kicks it.
And I'm with you on the hypocrisy thing. Totally.
Posted by: dabrettman at March 28, 2005 08:59 AMee & dabrettman,
I totally agree with both of you. I think 3 makes a circle jerk. Who's already unzipped?
ee, I would quibble a little with your math, since you're using arithmetical operators when using logical operators is more appropriate. But this can all be cleaned up with the addition of a few more variables, a slight change in your definitions, and a switch to logical operators. The new variables are 'T' = "you are not an expert in any of the related fields", 'S' = "You are not any of the Schiavo family", 'U' = "you have an opinion on the Terry Schiavo case", and finally 'W' = "you are a total effin' moron". I'd change 'Y' to mean "you are aware of the facts of the Schiavo case". Now, using standard logic, you can derive all manner of interesting tautologies that result either in "your opinion is irrelevant", "you are a total effin' moron", or a combination of both.
nicely done. i'm gonna send some traffic your way...
Posted by: sweetney at March 28, 2005 09:54 AMSo..basically youy say you are fed up with Schav o take and you go on to spew more paragraphs of your owm. What you should have said was "Im fed up with everyone's opinion but my own".
Posted by: Eddie at March 28, 2005 11:29 AMeddie- exactly! Because you see, I'm a HUGE hypocrite.
Posted by: eebmore at March 28, 2005 12:43 PM"Knowing is half the battle"
Posted by: Jeff Price aka GI Joe at March 28, 2005 10:04 PMHey, ee. Here's an article worth reading
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/21571/
I'm having a hard time understanding why anybody what's to be involved with this case. It's none of my business and I could not be more thankful for that. The last thing I want to do is decided whether someone I love lives or dies and the second to last is deciding that for a stranger. I'm only hoping whatever decision is finally made that family is able to live with it.
On another note - your illustration of hypocrisy may need work. You've made your point but there is a huge difference between abortion, euthanasia and execution. Only one of them is carried out as a punishment and that really is a huge difference. But even though it's possible to make the point is it a worthy point to make? A year ago I made a decision that a few months ago I was completely incapable of making again. Life is so complex that no two situations are the same. Distilling the issue down and pointing out the hypocrisy accomplishes about as much as pointing out the selfishness. Faced with those moral dilemmas people make the choices they believe they are most able to live with. What more should be asked of them?
I suppose that since I'm one of those who have voiced an opinion in favor of not killing Terri Schiavo, I should "shut my hole, already." But, fools rushing in and all that ...
It seems that, in a way, your two fundamental convictions are mutually contradictory. On the one hand, you say that you “do not have one single clue into the nature of the metaphysical,” and, on the other hand, you say that no one else does either. But, isn’t the second statement saying something about the “metaphysical”? To say that no one understands anything about the metaphysical seems to me to be a strong, universal, and emphatic claim about the metaphysical, namely that it (a) either does not exist or (b) is either inherently or practically unknowable. Both possibilities are showing that you think you do have at least one clue into the nature of the metaphysical.
There are other possibilities that would be logically compatible with your first certainty. It could be that you do not have a single clue, but I do. Or, we could both be deluded and the only one in all of history who really got it was some obscure Buddhist monk in the 18th century who fell on his head.
Or, I could just be playing semantic games. Either way, to say that every person in every time in every culture who has ever said anything positive about “the metaphysical” is flat out wrong strikes me as requiring a great deal more “faith” (as you’re using the word)/dogmatism/certainty than saying that, given the uncertainty surrounding Ms. Schiavo, it is better to err on the side of life.
Anyway, just some random thoughts.
Posted by: maphet at March 29, 2005 10:35 AMdude, i have a question to ask you of a uhh sensitive nature. hit me email stylee when you're around...
Posted by: sweetney at March 29, 2005 07:40 PMHave more to say? Please mail me:
eebmore at yahoo dot com.
Complete Archives
Links to other peoples' crap
![]()
The photoblog.

Previous Mastheads.
email: eebmore at yahoo dot com
aim: eebmore@mac.com
syndicate: (rss 1.0) (atom)
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
Hosted by baltiblogs
Powered by Movable Type
Masthead JavaScripts provided for free by
The JavaScript Source
Optimized for Safari/Firefox/Opera
